Already Used a Claims Management Company? What Are Your Options?
Nadeem Pervazis a solicitor at Edward & Amaury Solicitors, a law firm authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Content is reviewed for legal accuracy and compliance with FCA guidance and SRA conduct standards.
TL;DR — Quick Summary
- ▸Using a CMC does not prevent you switching to a solicitor — check your contract for termination rights and any fee obligations.
- ▸Solicitors are legally qualified and can issue court proceedings, provide legal advice, and handle complex cases in a way a CMC cannot.
- ▸If a CMC is not progressing your claim, you can complain to the CMC, then to the FOS, which now covers CMC complaints.
- ▸A rejected CMC claim does not necessarily mean your case is over — a solicitor can review whether the grounds were properly presented.
- ▸For large DB transfer, SIPP, or public sector pension claims, solicitor-led representation typically delivers better outcomes.
Many people first approach a claims management company (CMC) about a pension mis-selling claim, only to find the process is slower or less satisfying than expected. If you are unhappy with your CMC's progress, or simply want a second opinion, you may have more options than you realise — including switching to a solicitor.
Quick Answer
Using a CMC first doesn't close off your options. Check your contract for termination rights, and contact us for a free assessment — we can advise on whether and how to switch, without obligation.
CMC vs Solicitor — What's the Difference?
| Factor | CMC | Solicitor |
|---|---|---|
| Regulated by | FCA | SRA (and FCA for claims work) |
| Can issue court proceedings | No | Yes |
| Can provide legal advice | No | Yes |
| Professional indemnity | Required by FCA rules | Required by SRA |
| Can advise on limitation | No | Yes |
| Can pursue complex claims | Limited | Yes — including Court of Appeal, Supreme Court cases |
See also our full guide on solicitor vs direct claim.